(top) Six in the City
August 16th, 2008 by Gerald NortonDoes Ottawa have their secondary scoring resolved? More specifically, is secondary scoring really an issue on Ottawa, considering they were the highest scoring team in the NHL?
It is my view that Ottawa’s second line will resemble the top line of the Detroit Red Wings, albeit not nearly as offensively gifted. Like the Wings top line, the Sens second line will provide shut down calibre defensive play, while providing sufficient offensive prowess to keep the opposition honest, if not scared. This worked well for the Wings in the Cup final where Datsyuk and Zetts significantly reduced their production vs PIT, but also shut down their opponents top lines. The offensive slack was picked up by the second unit, where-as on Ottawa, this job will fall into the capable hands of the Pizza line. Let’s be clear, goal-scoring is not an issue for Ottawa, but goal prevention is, and last season, the top line was all too often victims of their lack of sound defensive play against top line opposition.
Here are the two second line options I predict for 2008-09;
Option #1
Kelly - Vermette - Fisher
Kelly - There is no doubt that Kelly is no sniper. But he does bring a synergistic mix of skills that have proven to improve the play of those around him. Kelly is a beast on the fore check, and despite his average size, throws his body around effectively, and often. He is tenacious along the boards, and often digs out the puck and gets it back into play in the offensive zone. He can finish a play, but this is not his calling. Defensively, he can remain on the ice no matter what line goes over the boards, which makes him a great player to send out first when playing on the road.
Vermette - Due for a break-out year (again…), but for once will probably get top six minutes by default, and not be shifted out as soon as things don’t go great, as was the norm in the past. He will garner the pivot role as both he and Kelly are LH shots, and Vermy represents the better set up man of the two. Vermette has superior defensive abilities, and an above average set of hands, that many believe have lacked the opportunity to prove their worth.
Fisher - He has yet to legitimize his top 6 offensive cred, but he is not a liability either. After struggling enormously with groin issues all last season, the hope is Fisher can finally put it all together and emerge as the premier physical 2 way forward he is expected to be. I forecast him moving to the right wing as he and Alfredsson are the only RH shots among the top six forwards, but there is no lack of depth at centre.
Option #2 (My personal favourite)
Kelly - Vermette - Alfredsson
This line up is a distinct possibility. If Fisher and Alfredsson were to switch places, the effect could be dramatic, in that it spreads the offense, and brings a renewed physical dimention to the top line that is unfair to continue to ask of Alfredsson at 36.
Between Spezza and Heatley, the top line remains highly offensively capable, and Fisher can focus on bringing the physical presence and defensive conscience that best suits his game. In fact, Heatley’s play at the World Cup showed the impact a hard fore checking forward can have in freeing up Heatley’s one timer. Fisher can also play the Holmstrom role in front of the net, a role that the top line is currently missing. On the second line, Alfredsson brings his tremendous work ethic, physical play, and offensive ability, all while providing exceptional defensive acumen. This will also allow Alfie to reduce his ES ice time and maintain his #1 role on the PP. The days of +23 min. games should be in Alfies past if the club expects him performing at his best through out a long and arduous season. This same mix (with Stillman in Alfies spot) was highly productive last season (until Kelly went down to injury), and was the unofficial second line. Alfredsson represents a huge upgrade to Stillman, in all aspects, and could make this line a very dynamic performer at both ends of the ice.
How do you see the top six setting up? Your thoughts are always welcome.








3 Responses to “(top) Six in the City”
By dany huston on Aug 18, 2008
Great article.
First of all, fisher should be on the wing.PERIOD.
Vermette must be a center.He was 6th overall in faceoffs in the nhl.PERIOD.
Spezz and heater need somebody with defensive ability and grit. Kelly Vermette Fisher all fit the bill.
But with kelly up there line 1 and 2 is off handed.
Heatley Spezza Kelly
Alfie Vermette Fisher
I dont know if this is a real issue but for cycling the puck it would be off.
I dont like the sound of vermette on line 1 just yet.I really dont.Too many expectations and he has enough pressure already.
I like the sound of fisher up there.Fast,hardworker should rub off on those 2.
Alfredsson should drop to line 2 cuz yes hes getting old and a couple less minutes would help him out.
Also last season vermette and fisher didnt play alot and chemistry never seemed to be there.
KElly should be a top 6.
But alfredsson showed signs of chemistry with kelly and fisher.
Heatley Spezza Fisher
Kelly Vermette Alfredsson
HERES HOPING!
By Oman on Aug 18, 2008
I definitely like the idea of Fisher on the first line with Spezza and Heatley. They could use someone with them to take and give hits. And otherwise, unless Vermette, Kelly and Fisher really step it up, the Sens may become a one line team. Goal scoring may not seem like an issue in the regular season, but a one line team can easily be shut down in the playoffs. To succeed in the playoffs they need to spread out the scoring a lot more. I know defense is/was a key concern, but I think that being too dependent on one line could be just as big a problem.
By Gerald Norton on Aug 19, 2008
Being dependent on one line is not good. When the total goals is broken down into a factor influencing wins, it becomes all the more apparent that with one line, when they are shut down, the Sens lose. This makes them easy prey for teams like Detroit who play a patient and very defensively responsible game able to control top offense talent. A legit second line will have a non linear impact on winning percentage, IMO.
Thanks for the comments guys, I love the hockey talk.